"The guy has to say something about everything!!! It's all against him, and he is a crusader for justice (LOL) watch that go on a website!!" As quoted by Sergio Gonzalez of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation - Regional Program Administrator.
SarasotaCodeCorruption.com

Sarasota County
Code Corruption


MEG WITTMER CORRUPTION



Civil Rights
The dedication of people to right the wrongs perpetrated on innocent Sarasota citizens and contractors, extends to pursuing action against government agencies, employers, and retail establishments for civil rights violations involving discrimination and harassment, code enforcement misconduct, and abuses of power. These important cases not only seek to compensate individuals for the harm done to them, but to change public policy and prevent similar abuses from happening to others.
 
Code Enforcement in Sarasota County Misconduct


While excessive force and police brutality is a stark example of civil rights violations, illegal or unconstitutional police misconduct may appear in many other forms, from harassment to false arrests, to false code enforcement citations issued by Harvey Ayers in Sarasota County. Most arrests must be done pursuant to a warrant, although there are several exceptions. Likewise, all searches and seizures must be reasonable, even in cases where the warrant requirement does not apply. Addressing these matters within the criminal case may not fully redress the wrongs committed, and civil action may be necessary to fully remedy the illegal or wrongful conduct.

Other Governmental Abuses of Power
In the context of criminal law, the prosecutor wields even more power than the police, and prosecutorial abuses are just as dangerous to the individual and society. Malicious prosecution – a prosecution undertaken in bad faith or for bad motives – is a violation of civil rights.

The government may also act inappropriately in regard to an individual’s
First Amendment rights to freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to peaceful assembly, and others. While the government may lawfully regulate speech and conduct in some respects, some laws and ordinances may be unconstitutional on their face, while others may be applied in such a way as to violate individual or group rights.

Harassment and Discrimination
Civil rights violations are not limited to government actors. Local, state and federal laws and constitutions protect individual rights in the areas of employment, fair housing, public accommodations such as hotels and restaurants, admission to career schools, and other areas. These laws protect an individual from discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex, age, disability, and other factors.

Wherever There is Injustice
In addition to the U.S. and Florida Constitutions, there are many state and federal statutes protecting civil rights. Also, city ordinances have been enacted as well as county ordinances covering numerous counties. many attorneys and the ACLU are prepared to handle your case in whatever forum is most appropriate to resolving your complaint, whether it be before the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) Civil Rights Division, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), or in state or federal court. If you believe that your civil rights have been violated, speak up.
Harvey Ayers MUST GO PETITION

SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT These cases are about much more than building code violations, unlicensed contracting, or allegedly aiding and abetting. They are about a corrupt Sarasota County code enforcement department that has targeted me for my vocal opposition to its policies, for complaints I've filed, for questioning the credibility and trustworthiness of its employees, including Harvey Ayers, Gu8y McCauley and Robert Lepley and appears to be a favor to a disgruntled local politician and former customer of mine State Senator Greg Steube. Their actions constitute what's known as selective enforcement, which is an affirmative defense I have provided notice that I would asserting in the hearings but was not permitted. At previous hearings the County and former magistrate erroneously believed that selective enforcement is not a defense in code enforcement proceedings. I had to educate them. Therefore, I provided copies of Polk County v. Mitchell, 931 So.2d 922 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2006), Powell v. City of Sarasota, 953 So.2d 5 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2006), and Campbell v. Rainbow City, Alabama, 434 F.3d 1306 (11th Cir. 2006). These cases explain that selective enforcement is in fact a cognizable defense in these types of proceedings. As required by those cases I demonstrate that the County has targeted me because it has arbitrarily classified me as an enemy of the county code enforcement department. I demonstrate that I have been treated differently from other similarly situated individuals and that the County has unequally applied a facially neutral ordinance and state statute for the purpose of discriminating against me. You will learn through evidence and testmony presented that in early 2017 I did contract work for State Senator Greg Stuebe. Mr. Stuebe was not happy with my services and appears to have used his political influence and clout to persuade Sarasota County to come after me in retaliation and after Senator Greg Steube told on of my subcontractors that he was going to make my life a living hell. The day after Senator Greg Stuebe filed a complaint, Sarasota County employees stormed all of my job sites, threatened my workers, scared my customers and extorted my private banking records under the threat of putting me out of business and stopping work on my jobs. In May 2017 I filed a complaint against county employees. This was a big mistake because since then code enforcement officer Harvey Ayers has written me and my subcontractor a total of 16 citations, 8 of which I have had dismissed. I have been dragged before both the Sarasota County General and Mechanical Licensing and Examining Boards a total of four times. My building and roofing licenses have been revoked within the County and my HVAC license suspended for two years. I have been before magistrate Wittmer a total of 3 times, with countless other hearings scheduled but cancelled. The citations before the Court today have been reissued twice. These cases are about retaliation, not code citations. I have filed two appeals and four petitioners for writ of certiorari and am in the process of filing two more appeals in the Twelfth Judicial Circuit Court in Sarasota Florida for relief. Recently the special magistrate, Robert Zack wrote in his final order that my licenses in the State of Florida have been revoked, funny thing is, the State of Florida has sent me certified letters stating that is untrue. The same magistrate said I am prohibited from working in Manatee County, funny thing is, Manatee County says “no you are NOT prohibited from working in Manatee County”, so where do these monkeys get their idiotic facts from? This is what I am battling and am determined to change the system so no one else ever has to deal with this corruption! It is now my life’s mission. Join the group of people that have been harassed and demoralized by lies, corruption, extortion and a system that is broken and lets protest, voice our opinions, get a petition signed and distributed and STOP THE INSANITY! In Sarasota County.

MALICIOUS CIVIL PROSECUTION These cases are a result of malicious civil prosecution. These cases began back in October 2017 when the citation was issued under case numbers CC-17-3606, CC-17-3949 and CC-17-4056(A). On Dec. 15, 2017, a hearing was held on the initial hearing, but was continued in order for the county to obtain a witness, which is not allowed and where Harvey Ayers lied under oath. A second hearing was held on Feb. 9, 2018. That hearing resulted in the county voluntarily dismissing all pending citations against me for their failure to meet statutory and ordinance requirement that the citation list the date and time of the alleged violation. On Feb. 12, 2018, the citations were all reissued. Those citations were scheduled to go to hearing April 13 2018, and April 20, 2018, but both were cancelled. On April 6, 2018, the County reissued the same citations, changing a few words of the facts, but under the new case number before the court today. The county is engaging in malicious civil prosecution of this citation. The county is well aware that the citation still fails to comport with the statutory requirements that it denote an accurate time and date. The county also continues to rely on the testimony of Harvey Ayers who they know to be unreliable, and who has a sordid history of unreputable conduct and dishonesty. Mr. Ayers has even committed the criminal offense of perjury on two occasions related to litigation, which I am involved, yet the county does not blink an eye when using him to attempt to prove its case. There is no reasonable explanation for the manner in which the county has decided to pursue its prosecution of me. It is malicious prosecution. The county lacked probable cause to bring forth these citations and allegations and continue to lack probable cause six long months later. I have won a favorable ruling in this case on Feb. 9, 2018, and on June 8, 2018 when the citations were dismissed. Yet, the county has since reissued the citations twice and changed the wording to suit themselves and stated that a licensed contractor is in violation when he signs a contract. WTF?


BRIAN KEISACKER:
Brian Keisacker Unqualified
BRIAN KEISACKER:
BRIAN KEISACKER UNETHICAL 156
BRIAN KEISACKER:
BRIAN KEISACKER INTEGRITY
BRIAN KEISACKER:
BRIAN KEISACKER Equal Dignity
BRIAN KEISACKER:
BRIAN KEISACKER UNFAIR JUSTICE
BRIAN KEISACKER:
BRIAN KEISACKER 103
BRIAN KEISACKER:
BRIAN KEISACKER Shameful 101

BRIAN KEISACKER:

BRIAN KEISACKER IGNORES THE LAW

BRIAN KEISACKER:

BRIAN KEISACKER UNETHICAL 102

BRIAN KEISACKER:
BRIANKEISACKER.COM VIOLATED DUE PROCESS
BRIAN KEISACKER:
BRIAN KEISACKER IGNORES THE LAW
Brian Keisacker Mistake of law
BRIAN KEISACKER:

Brian Keisacker Unethical Lawyer

I CERTAINLY WOULD NOT RECOMMEND EVER HIRING THIS UNETHICAL LAWYER - BRIAN KEISACKER!
Brian Keisacker is Unethical
Brian Keisacker works for Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A. in Sarasota, Florida.


One can only apply the facts and deduce that
Brian Keisacker is Unethical!

Brian Keisacker
BRIAN KEISACKER UNFAIR JUSTICE 2
Brian Keisacker
BRIAN KEISACKER unethical
Brian Keisacker
Brian Keisacker Outraged
Brian Keisacker
BRIAN KEISACKER Justice
Brian Keisacker
BRIAN KEISACKER 1
Brian Keisacker
Brian Keisacker Unprofessional Unethical

Brian Keisacker would rather be unethical, than follow the Sarasota County Ordinance 22-127(3).

From the transcript of August 15, 2019:
"…Attorney
Brian Keisacker, the rules -- the rules regulating the Florida Bar state that a lawyer shall not engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. That rule is under the ethics Chapter 4, which is 4-8.4(d) as in David. I hereby request that you recuse yourself from this hearing and this board."

"…
I believe that you're violating the rules regulating the Florida Bar and I believe that it's unethical and you should not be serving on this board. And you've known for a long time that you derive income from the construction industry and are unqualified to serve on this board."
CHAIRMAN
KEISACKER: And if you feel that way, I invite you to inform the Florida Bar that you feel I'm in violation --
Arrogance and unethical behavior by
Brian Keisacker!
Brian Keisacker Due Process
Brian Keisacker
BRIAN KEISACKER Injustice 2
Brian Keisacker
BRIAN KEISACKER UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR
BRIAN KEISACKER
BRIAN KEISACKER unethical behavior
Brian Keisacker

SEE SARASOTA COUNTY ORDINANCE 22-127(3)

BRIAN KEISACKER

Brian Keisacker Sarasota, Florida.

SEE SARASOTA COUNTY ORDINANCE 22-127(3)

  • (c)  The term "Consumer Representatives" used in this section shall be defined as set forth in F.S. § 489.131(10).
(2) Quorum. The General Contractors Licensing and Examining Board shall require six members present for a quorum and a majority of affirmative votes shall be required for passage of any Board action. The Mechanical Contractors Licensing and Examining Board shall require six members present for a quorum and a majority of affirmative votes shall be required for passage of any Board action.
  • (3)  Qualifications. Architects and Engineers are not required to be professionally registered in the State of Florida as a condition of appointment to a Board. The citizen at large member (Lawyer Brian Keisacker) shall be selected for appointment from Sarasota County resident applicants deriving no income from any source connected with the construction industry. Appointment shall be based on demonstrable training and experience acceptable to the Board of County Commissioners. PLAIN AND SIMPLE! Brian Keisacker is defiant!
  • 4)  Term of Appointment. Board members shall be appointed for a period of three years. The Board of County Commissioners may relieve Licensing Board members of their appointment for failure to attend a majority of the meetings each fiscal year. The appointed members of the Boards shall proceed to select a Chairman, Vice Chairman and a Secretary.
If a lawyer, namely Brian Keisacker does not know what due process is, ignores the legal doctrine of a meaningful opportunity to be heard, did not giving proper notice to a litigant before issuing a ruling stated notice was given when it wasn’t that was overturned by the Circuit Court and who serves on a local Sarasota County contractor board illegally as a consumer representative in violation of the ordinance then what was the purpose of going to law school at Stetson Law School? Is Brian Keisacker untrained? Is Brian Keisacker that corrupt and one sided? Is Brian Keisacker purposefully ignorant to the law? Or is Brian David Keisacker corrupt? You decide and ask yourself, would you even dream about hiring Brian Keisacker for any reason after discovering who he is? All the above are supported by the facts!

It is our beliefs from personal experiences with lawyer Brian D. Keisacker, has violated Respondent’s constitution rights where Brian D. Keisacker as chairman of the Sarasota County General Contractors Licensing and Examining Board did not accord due process guaranteed under the United States Constitution and served as a consumer representative, Brian Keisacker is in clear violation of Sarasota County Ordinance 22-127(3), where Brian Keisacker earns income from the construction industry.
Yet
Brian Keisacker refuses to follow the law:

Brian Keisacker
Brian Keisacker sits on the Board as a “Citizen at large (consumer representative)," one of three such positions required by Sarasota County Code § 22-127(1)(a). Of note, "[t]he citizen at large member shall be selected for appointment from Sarasota County resident applicants deriving no income from any source connected with the construction industry." Sarasota County Code § 22-127(3) (emphasis added). See also, § 489.131(10), Florida Statutes (2019).
Brian Keisacker represents dozens of clients in matters that are directly related to the construction industry.

In a résumé submitted with Brian Keisacker’s advisory application, Keisacker states:


“Prepare and file pleadings, motions, and responses to all aspects civil litigation in areas including foreclosure, boundary disputes,
construction defects…”


Since Brian Keisacker practices construction law and collects fees from construction related clients, he is currently deriving income from the construction industry, which is prohibited for individuals serving on the Board in his capacity. Brian Keisacker’s application to serve on the Board clearly and definitively indicates Brian Keisacker derives income from the construction industry, thereby defeating the intended purpose of a citizen/consumer representative.
Brian Keisacker’s specializes in construction law and advertises on their website as follows:

“Our firm provides a variety of services to contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, homeowners in connection with construction law matters, including preparation, negotiation and review of construction agreements as well as the preparation and service of notices to owner, claims of lien, contractor final affidavits and other document required by the Florida Construction Lien Law. Should litigation become necessary to enforce or defend the claim of a construction lienor, we prosecute and defend all aspects of lien foreclosure actions.”

Therefore, Brian Keisacker must not be on the Sarasota County General Contractors Licensing and Examining Board, yet Brian Keisacker is defiant and will not follow the ethical rules Brian Keisacker is supposed to follow.
In sum, since
Brian Keisacker occupies a seat on the Board which forbids earning income from the construction industry, Brian Keisacker may NOT legally serve the citizens of Sarasota County on its General Contractors Licensing and Examining Board, and Brian Keisacker cannot and must not preside over matters within the jurisdiction of the Board. ALL Respondents have a right to be heard before a Board comprised of individuals who meet all of the statute and ordinance requirements for service on the Board. Brian Keisacker

BRIAN KEISACKER SHOULD NOT BE SERVING ON THE CONTRACTOR BOARD AS A CONSUMER REPRESENTATIVE WHEN HE EARNS INCOME FROM THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSRTY. THIS IS IMMORAL AND UNETHICAL.

  • The content of this website is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which are beliefs based on personal experiences with Brian Keisacker as well as the law; and court orders issued by the Circuit Court. Sarasota County Ordinance 22-127(3) which Brian Keisacker has willingly and purposefully violated by serving on the Sarasota County General Contractors Licensing and Examining Board as a consumer representative, which states... “The citizen at large member shall be selected for appointment from Sarasota County resident applicants deriving no income from any source connected with the construction industry. “ Thus Brian Keisacker has, is clearly and willfully violating the law, ethics and his credibility, etc.
Arrogance and unethical behavior by Brian Keisacker!